Alpha lives in the Boardroom, not in the balance sheet!
- Pedro Gato Andeyro
- Aug 19, 2025
- 2 min read
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

In the private equity sector, generating Alpha, achieving returns above market benchmarks, has become an increasingly sophisticated and complex objective. Financial structuring and operational improvements, while essential, are no longer sufficient on their own to secure sustainable competitive advantage. In this context, corporate governance has emerged as a critical differentiator, capable of determining whether an investment merely meets its thesis or significantly exceeds it.
A well-aligned board of directors, with clearly defined roles, robust dynamics, and effective oversight, serves as a strategic catalyst. Yet experience demonstrates that many portfolio companies exhibit governance gaps that, if not addressed proactively, can erode value. These include overextended Chairs, agendas that fail to prioritize strategic imperatives, or Troikas (Chair–CEO–Investor) lacking cohesion and alignment.
The key to mitigating these risks lies in measuring what has historically been intangible. Just as financial KPIs provide foresight into performance outcomes, systematic evaluation of the corporate governance framework offers early indicators of execution capability, strategic alignment, and leadership quality.
Our analysis of portfolio company boards, highlights the measurable impact of governance assessments on alpha generation:
Boards with high governance effectiveness are twice as likely to achieve value creation milestones, whether during initial transformation, mid-cycle optimization, or pre-exit preparation.
Strong Troika alignment increases execution confidence by more than 30%, generating measurable momentum on critical strategic initiatives.
Systematic evaluations enable governance gaps to be identified up to 12 months before financial stress indicators appear, allowing for timely corrective action.
Structural board adjustments, including size, composition, and working dynamics, enhance decision-making agility and strengthen accountability.
There is no universal blueprint for building a high-performing board in portfolio companies. Practices that succeed in turnaround scenarios may be less effective during high-growth phases. Consequently, true value lies in defining, through objective evaluations and comparative data, what constitutes board excellence for each fund and each portfolio company.
Developing a metrics-driven governance framework allows funds to identify trends correlated with success, anticipate risks, and adapt the governance model to the company’s strategic context. This transforms corporate governance from a compliance obligation into a tangible, repeatable value-creation lever.
A rigorously evaluated governance system, grounded in reliable data, is a fundamental engine of value. Private equity investment is not limited to capital structures and operational initiatives; it encompasses leadership, board dynamics, and the capacity to execute with strategic vision and discipline.
Funds that place governance evaluation at the core of their strategy achieve not only enhanced resilience but also strengthened confidence from limited partners, co-investors, and executive teams. In sum, assessing and optimizing corporate governance is not a control exercise, it is a strategic driver of sustainable alpha generation.




Comments